E. Idaho bowhunters complain about elk tag numbers

The state is giving too many nonresident bowhunters a crack at bagging an elk in eastern Idaho, some Idaho hunters say.

“I think residents should be given first priority,” Scott Roberts of Pocatello told the Idaho State Journal.

Earlier this spring the Idaho Fish and Game Commission put a cap of 1,817 elk tags issued to bowhunters in the Diamond Creek Zone. Idaho residents will be allowed to buy 1,017 of the tags, leaving 800 tags for out-of-state hunters.

Toby Boudreau, regional manager for the Fish and Game office in Pocatello, said elk numbers have been declining in the Diamond Creek Zone and the cap is intended to reduce the number of elk killed. The Diamond Creek Zone runs from the southeast Idaho border to the eastern portion of Caribou County.

“We realized that not only were we not meeting our cow objective, but we were also not meeting our bull objective,” Boudreau said.

He said the cow elk population has dropped from about 2,500 in 2005 to about 1,200 in 2008. He said the objective is to keep the zone’s cow elk population between 1,300 and 1,900.

“It’s a pretty substantial drop,” Boudreau said. “When you’re not meeting your objective, the first thing you have to do is reduce harvest. Frankly, bow hunters last year took 337 elk, 270 of which were bulls. That was a success rate of 16.3 percent, which is pretty high for an archery hunt.”

Roberts said the reduction in tags is too late, and should have been done five years ago.

“Because of the overcrowding, the elk have become very educated to catching and traditional elk hunting tactics,” he said. “It’s getting harder, and to be honest, it’s not as fun as it used to be.”

Hunter Doug Gushwa of Pocatello agreed that limiting the number of tags is a good idea but Idaho residents should be given more.

“I think it’s a good plan to have a quota,” he said. “I’ve hunted in that area for years, and over the last five or six years, I’m either becoming a much poorer hunter or there’s a lot less elk. (But) it’s inappropriate and unfair that it’s proportioned the way it is. There won’t be any resident hunters. When the tags go on sale (in August), it’s going to be a free-for-all brouhaha.”

But Boudreau said that about half of the elk tags are purchased by out-of-state hunters already.

“It’s not capricious. It’s something that’s set in rule. The law set that number for us,” he said.

He added the policy could be changed in July to reduce the number of elk tags given to nonresidents.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Share

Comments

  1. I thought I would email to introduce myself and the product I represent. The product is a video camera mount for a bow. You can also use it in your tree, on your crossbow or your gun or groundblind. The main body is a stainless steel scent tube where you store your hoist rope along with your favorite scent. Each time you pull your bow up to your stand, you have 15 feet of scented rope hanging below you. Check out our site at http://www.bowcamtreecam.com. The wholesale price is $59.95. The MSRP is $99.95. I would like to get one into your shop. Please let me know if I can send you one. All the best, I look forward to hearing from you. Perry

  2. There are residents where I live that say the same thing about Rainy Lake, and our fishing meaning YOURS AND MINE. Unless Idaho residents own the NATIONAL FOREST AND THE ELK I dont see why you should get more. I was wondering if the residents would like to pick up the tens of millions of dollars, [maybe in taxes or raise resident fees] that would other wise end up in CO if us unwanted nonresidents never went back to Idaho. The nonresident hunter helps manage YOUR game and YOUR resources.

  3. Jeff, I agree with you as your taxes, purchases from outdoor gear should go their budget.

    If they reduced the amount of non-resident tags and put it up for lottery, it may drive up revenue for the state.

  4. Jeff Bray says

    Personally I believe that the revenue generated by the out of stater’s should take second place to the residents right to a great hunt. I mean come on! the reason I live in Idaho is for the hunting, I have made sacrifices to live here (in lower wage jobs etc…)If the state is going to place greed before the residents rights, then they should reduce the quotas, raise the rates and let them (out of stater’s)pay the lions share of what they’re (IFG)trying to generate in revenue! This year the out of state hunters get almost half of the Diamond Creek tags, THAT’S BULL! (no pun intended) The max on out of state tags should’nt exceed more than 20-25% of the available tags!